[cpp-threads]atomic operations package

[Alexander Terekhov]

On 8/22/05, Hans Boehm <Hans.Boehm at hp.com> wrote:
[...]
> > http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/pgdh?entry=caring_for_the_environment_making
> >
> I don't understand the problem here.  The code there contains another
> instance of broken double-checked locking.  The only use of a memory
> barrier I see could easily be translated to our current proposal.

I don't think so. Intentional leaking (together with real GC or 
hazards) aside for a moment, Phil Harman is driving at atomic<>ized 
Andrei's WRRMMap, I think.

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c++/msg/3d48651534c866f8

How would you translate it to the current proposal?

regards,
alexander.