[cpp-threads] New strawman proposal

[Alexander Terekhov]

On 6/8/05, Doug Lea <dl at cs.oswego.edu> wrote:
[...]
> 3. The first test of the approach will be to create tables
> of synchronizing operations that define the relations.
> Offhand, it seems necessary to do this as a full N X N
> table, where N is the number of synchronizing operations
> (plus rows/cols for non-synchronizing ones?). Maybe the
> advocates of 16-fold atomic operations would like to
> try to create such tables and see if they come out sensibly?

It's simply a bunch of release->acquire "pairs". For C.POSIX it is:

http://www.decadentplace.org.uk/pipermail/cpp-threads_decadentplace.org.uk/2005-April/000222.html
(XBD 4.10 edit)

http://www.opengroup.org/austin/mailarchives/ag/msg07704.html

regards,
alexander.