[cpp-threads] C++ committee meeting in Mont Tremblant

[Peter Dimov]

Doug Lea wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:

>> I agree that static initialisation can currently be much more
>> difficult than it really should be.  However, this problem is not
>> really on-topic for this list, so can we leave the matter now?
> 
> Well, there IS the back-door issue about memory-model rules that
> may apply to guarantee ordering and visibility of static initializers.

Can you give an example of the issue?