[cpp-threads] [Fwd: [Javamemorymodel-discussion] MSDNonMemorymodels]

[Alexander Terekhov]

On 9/15/05, Vance Morrison <vancem at exchange.microsoft.com> wrote:
[...]
> A more detailed description is in order.    Note that this last example
> was the one that there was the most internal debate about whether we
> could make rules that would actually allow it to work in the model.   

I think that "1..5" model is totally busted. I gather that you were 
driving at a model with loads having implicit cc_acq + dd_acq, and 
with implicit .rel stores.

regards,
alexander.