[cpp-threads] Preparing for Oxford

[Alexander Terekhov]

On 12/30/06, Peter Dimov <pdimov at mmltd.net> wrote:
> Herb Sutter wrote:
>
> > Thinking over the past month's discussion, what effect will/should
> > this have on the C++ MM and atomics proposals for the April meet in
> > Oxford? Here's my suggestion:
> >
> >   1. Eliminate, or at least split out, the low-level non-SC atomics
> > features.
> >   2. Add type abstractions for a few key uses of non-SC atomics
> > (e.g., DCL, RC).
> >   3. (Hard to do for Oxford) Simplify the proposal to use a single
> > ordering relation.
>
> I'm probably missing some background information here. Do you have a current
> spec for Prism?

Plus its reference implementation for XBoxes, upcoming boxes included .

regards,
alexander.