[cpp-threads] Re: Dependency-based ordering

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:09:09PM -0700, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> On 6/20/07, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >So I am quite concerned about leaving out the part that allows dependency
> >chains to cross compilation-unit boundaries.
> 
> Do you have reason to believe that compiling all code in case it might be
> in a dependency chain is an acceptable price?

In my experience, yes.  But others' mileage apparently varies, which is
why I proposed annotating the function arguments and return values.

						Thanx, Paul