[cpp-threads] N2052 sequencing revisions & examples (moderately
long)
Jeremy Manson
jmanson at cs.umd.edu
Sat Mar 10 17:55:39 GMT 2007
Hans Boehm wrote:
> [Superficial] Should we get rid of "synchronizes with" and just
> directly integrate it into happens-before?
We added it because we had to do discuss things like "sufficient
synchronizes-with". If you don't have a clear reason for it, you
shouldn't need to keep it.
Having said that, it is a reasonably useful thing to use when explaining
how happens-before works.
Jeremy
More information about the cpp-threads
mailing list