[cpp-threads] Asynchronous Function Proposal

[Bjarne Stroustrup]

Herb Sutter wrote:
> Hans wrote:
>   
>
>>
>> A more minimalist approach may be to support only the fully_threaded
>> policy for now, but leave room for additional policies in the future.
>>     
>
> I disagree. We should provide "run on another thread" (not necessarily a new thread!), "run on this thread," and "implementation decides."
>
> Herb
>
>   

agreed (my minimalist approach would be to provide only "implementation 
decides", but since that has no hope of passing, I don't propose 
something that minimal)