[cpp-threads] Static member functions, member access syntax and sequenced-before

[N.M. Maclaren]

On Nov 23 2011, Peter Dimov wrote:
>
>It doesn't matter that you can statically determine that the value of 
>requests[0].Waitall is Request::Waitall. The function call is sequenced 
>after requests[0], its evaluation being a part of the evaluation of 
>requests[0].Waitall, and that's that. 

We are still at cross-purposes, but I am clearly not going to succeed
in explaining my question, so shall give up.


Regards,
Nick maclaren.