pre-LilleHammer mailing deadline

Boehm, Hans hans.boehm at hp.com
Sat Mar 5 03:00:27 GMT 2005


I am planning to have it refer to N1680, and just list, and propose
solutions to, a few fundamental problems that we would like guidance on.
Is that consistent with normal procedures?

Thanks.

Hans

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nelson, Clark [mailto:clark.nelson at intel.com] 
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 2:59 PM
> To: Boehm, Hans
> Cc: Doug Lea; jimmaureenrogers at att.net; Ben Hutchings; Andrei 
> Alexandrescu; Kevlin Henney; Bill Pugh; Maged Michael; 
> asharji at plg.uwaterloo.ca; Richard Bilson
> Subject: RE: pre-LilleHammer mailing deadline
> 
> 
> > We discovered today that the deadline for the pre-Lillehammer
> > mailing is today.
> > 
> > Hoe firm is that deadline?
> 
> Today is the nominal deadline. The actual deadline is Monday 
> morning (Pacific time), and that's pretty firm. If you can't 
> be ready to publish by Monday, then I'm afraid it'll have to 
> wait until the post-meeting mailing. Of course it would also 
> be possible to distribute it at Lillehammer for discussion, 
> if someone is going to be there -- or possibly even if not.
> 
> In whatever mailing it goes, you can use N1777=05-0037 to 
> identify it. Will it be a revision of N1680?
> 
> Clark
> 






More information about the cpp-threads mailing list