C++ MT discussion group

[Hans Boehm]

Sounds good to me.  I think a public archive for the mailing list would be
good.

Hans

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Ben Hutchings wrote:

> Doug Lea wrote:
> > Kevlin Henney wrote:
> > >In message <422FFC79.5050700 at metalanguage.com>, Andrei Alexandrescu
> > ><andrei at metalanguage.com> writes
> > >
> > >>I've just sent the message below to Michael Pryhodko, who asked to join
> > >>our group. He's participated in a number of discussions on MT on
> > >>comp.lang.c++.moderated, which I haven't had the time to follow. Please
> > >>let me know what you think about adding him to the list.
> > >
> > >
> > >I don't have any objections in principle to this. However, it might be
> > >worth actually treating this as a group rather than a cc'd list. Ben set
> > >up such a list, IIRC. Should we all move over to it?
> > >
> >
> > Ben: If you haven't already done this,
> > I can set up a list using "mailman" here. Easy to do.
>
> That's what I did.  Back in September it was probably overkill but now
> it would be more useful.
>
> The list is called cpp-threads at decadentplace.org.uk and has a web page at
> <http://jupiter.robustserver.com/mailman/listinfo/cpp-threads_decadentplace.org.uk>.
> The list description probably needs a little revision.
>
> > One reason to do so is to avoid people being left off CC lists
> > by mistake, which happend to Peter Buhr last week!
>
> It also makes filing easier - one can set a rule to file incoming
> mail sent to the list address into a specific folder.
>
> If everyone's happy with using a mailing list then I can bulk-add all
> your addresses.  I could also try to add previous messages to the list
> archive though I don't know whether that's possible.  Note that the
> archive is currently set to be public.
>
> Ben.
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings
> If more than one person is responsible for a bug, no one is at fault.
>