[cpp-threads] Yet another visibility question

[Lawrence Crowl]

On 12/13/06, Peter Dimov <pdimov at mmltd.net> wrote:
> Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > On 12/13/06, Peter Dimov <pdimov at mmltd.net> wrote:
> >>> Actually, in Lawrence's and my current draft proposal, we do
> >>> distinguish.  There are atomic types, even at the C level.
> >>
> >> Is the draft available for viewing?
> >
> > Soon.
>
> Any hints on how you intend to tag the atomic variables?

There are distinct types, no tagging.  That is, atomic_int is a
type name.

-- 
Lawrence Crowl