[cpp-threads] Revised Atomic Paper

[Lawrence Crowl]

On 8/15/07, Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> > Hm.  Maybe you've been reviewing an earlier draft.  Caught that one
> > as well.
>
> The version I'm looking at is the only one I saw posted here, dated
> 2007-08-01.

I was looking at the published version, which is a bit different from
the posted version.

> > > The following sentences in the paragraph should be deleted.
> >
> > Which sentences?  I'm no longer confident in what I might guess.
>
> "Therefore, there is a single wait-free query per type. However, the
> proposal defines operations on the atomic_flag type to be wait-free."

I'm not convinced that the sentences should  be deleted, but there
is clearly a problem with the wording.

Thanks for the comments.

-- 
Lawrence Crowl