[cpp-threads] seq_cst compare_exchange and store-load fencing

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 06:45:41PM -0700, Nelson, Clark wrote:
> > > It sounds like we need a library issue?
> > 
> > How about the following?  If we are keeping hands off of section
> > 1.10, then my suggestion about adding the definition of SC in 1.10
> > is inoperative.
> 
> I think this is more than adequate as a statement of the issue. Thanks
> for putting it together, Paul.
> 
> Personally, I would rather not have sentences in the standard -- even
> in non-normative text -- that start with "if you want". But that's purely
> an editorial concern, and is no reason not to forward this to Howard.

I have full confidence in our editor.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul