[cpp-threads] Coherence Requirement wording changes for 1.10p13

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:05:47AM -0700, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> 
> > I like the way this breaks out the write/write, read/read, ... cases!
> 
> Yeah. This was done by popular demand after discussion. Makes it much
> easier to read now I think. 
> 
> Just wait till you see this with the coherence requirement list AND the
> pictures!!! (Apparently the document editor needs these in dot format.)

:-)

Hopefully at least one of these pictures will tell me how you can get
multiple visible sequences of side effects on a single atomic object
with respect to a single value computation, because I am not seeing it!

							Thanx, Paul